Cochlear Mechanisms and Otoacoustic Emission Test Performance.
Nikki A Go, Greta C Stamper, Tiffany A Johnson
PMID 29952805WHAT IT FOUND
Reducing the reflection source in DPOAE screening did not improve hearing loss identification overall.
In selected ears with fine structure, it improved mild loss detection at lower levels, while stimulus-frequency emissions were less accurate.
Key findings
01Reducing the reflection-source contribution did not improve DPOAE accuracy over the best condition with both sources present.
02In the reduced subset of ears with confirmed fine structure, reducing the reflection-source contribution improved detection of mild hearing loss at lower stimulus levels.
03Reflection-source AM-SFOAEs were less accurate than DPOAE conditions at identifying hearing loss.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The study included people aged 12 to 80 years, not newborns or young children, so it may not apply to the population usually screened with OAEs. Only ears with normal middle-ear function and thresholds below 60 dB HL at 1 to 4 kHz were included, so it says nothing about more severe losses or middle-ear problems. The sample was deliberately enriched with ears likely to produce errors, so overall accuracy was lower than in a general screening population. The smoothing technique required lengthy testing and is not suitable for routine clinical use. SFOAEs cannot currently be recorded with clinical instruments, and the amplitude-modulated technique used here has not been thoroughly tested. The subset analysis with confirmed fine structure excluded many normal ears, especially uncertain ones, so its findings may not reflect routine patients. In-the-ear canal calibration was used, which may have contributed to some errors, particularly at 4 kHz. Some accuracy values in the uncertain group at 4 kHz fell below chance because the recruitment strategy included normal ears with small emissions and impaired ears with large emissions.
Declared interests
The supplied text does not include a funding or conflict-of-interest declaration. The publication types list Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that smoothing DPOAE fine structure should replace clinical DPOAE screening. In the full group it did not improve accuracy over the best standard condition, and the benefit appeared only in a selected subset with confirmed fine structure.