Clinical Relevance of NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery Developmental Change in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: Associations with Verbal Reasoning.
Andrew Dakopolos, Numfon Vilay, Iris Chen and 7 others
Over two years, NIH Toolbox Crystallized Cognition scores tracked growth in verbal knowledge and verbal reasoning in 263 people with intellectual disabilities.
The brief iPad test is a valid outcome measure for monitoring verbal cognitive development in this population.
Key findings
1Two-year change in NIH Toolbox Crystallized Cognition was significantly associated with change in Verbal Knowledge (β = 7.92, p = .009) and with change in Verbal Fluid Reasoning (β = 4.91, p = .018).
2Higher baseline Crystallized Cognition predicted greater growth in both verbal domains, while higher baseline verbal scores predicted less growth in their own domain but more Crystallized Cognition growth, suggesting a compensatory pattern across the two years.
3The study did not control for the services or interventions participants received between visits, so the observed developmental changes may partly reflect untracked treatment effects rather than natural maturation alone.
to read the rest of this summary — three full summaries a month, no card.
Already have an account?
What it does not show
Only two assessment time points, which limits statistical power and the ability to model the shape of change over time. Services and interventions received between visits were not tracked or controlled for, so observed gains may reflect treatment effects rather than natural development. Participants were restricted to mental age of 3.0 years or above, excluding those with more significant delays. Only the Crystallized Cognition component was examined; the Fluid Cognition tests were not evaluated for developmental sensitivity. The study is observational and cannot establish that the NIH Toolbox CC is sensitive to a specific intervention's effects.
Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →