RNOtherJMIR nursing2025

Clinical, Operational, and Economic Benefits of a Digitally Enabled Wound Care Program in Home Health: Quasi-Experimental, Pre-Post Comparative Study.

Heba Tallah Mohammed, Kathleen Corcoran, Kyle Lavergne and 8 others

PMID 40198913

WHAT IT FOUND

Home health branches using a digital wound care system saw wounds heal 4.3 days faster on average.

Nurses also spent less time on visits and conducted fewer visits per episode. This improvement occurred alongside clinician training, not just the technology.

Key findings

01The average time to heal a wound decreased by 4.3 days in branches using the digital system, compared to a 1.6-day decrease in control branches.

02Branches using the digital system saw a 4.3% reduction in skilled nursing visits per episode and a 2.5% reduction in the average time per visit.

03The program involved both the digital technology and advanced education and training for clinicians in wound management.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study was conducted in a single large home health agency, so results may not generalize to other organizations with different workflows or demographics. The preadoption period coincided with the COVID-19 pandemic, which may have disrupted usual care patterns and influenced the results. The intervention included both a digital tool and a comprehensive training program, making it difficult to isolate the effect of the technology alone. The study did not assess sociodemographic variables, patient costs, or quality of life.

Declared interests

The study was conducted by CenterWell Home Health, which implemented the program. The authors are affiliated with the organization and the evaluation team. The paper does not explicitly state external funding sources for the research itself, but it evaluates a proprietary solution used by the authors' employer.

The easy way to misread this

Do not attribute the improved healing times and efficiency solely to the digital technology. The adoption branches also received advanced education and training (PRIME), and the study design cannot separate the contribution of the training from the technology.

Read it on PubMed →