SLPCohortTrends in hearing2025

Children With Bilateral Cochlear Implants Show Emerging Spatial Hearing of Stationary and Moving Sound.

Robel Z Alemu, Alan Blakeman, Angela L Fung and 5 others

PMID 40611671

WHAT IT FOUND

Children with bilateral cochlear implants show emerging but impaired spatial hearing for stationary and moving sounds compared to peers.

They rely less effectively on head and eye movements to localize sound, and their accuracy correlates with sensitivity to timing cues rather than level differences.

Key findings

01Children with bilateral cochlear implants had significantly poorer localization accuracy for both stationary and moving sounds compared to peers with typical hearing.

02Localization performance was associated with sensitivity to interaural timing differences (ITDs), but not interaural level differences (ILDs).

03Children with implants used head and eye movements (gaze) less effectively and less accurately than typical hearing peers during sound localization tasks.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study only tested localization in the horizontal plane (azimuth) and did not assess elevation or front-back confusions. The implant group had relatively minimal hearing deprivation and good speech perception, so results may not generalize to children with longer periods of deafness or poorer speech outcomes. Head and eye tracking data were missing or of insufficient quality for some participants (5/42 in the implant group had no concurrent gaze data). The study is cross-sectional, so it cannot determine if spatial hearing abilities improve with age or training in this specific cohort.

Declared interests

The authors received no financial support for the research and declared no potential conflicts of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not interpret the 'emerging' spatial hearing as functional equivalence to typical hearing. The localization errors for moving sounds (33.9 degrees) are very large, meaning a child may point to a sound source more than 30 degrees away from its actual location. This level of inaccuracy is unlikely to support safe navigation or effective listening in noisy classrooms.

Read it on PubMed →