OTSystematic ReviewOccupational therapy in health care2023

Characteristics of Early Interventions for Pain and Function Following Lower Extremity Joint Replacement: Systematic Review.

Isabella Foussell, Marisa Negley, Abigail Thompson and 5 others

PMID 35654087

WHAT IT FOUND

Task-oriented exercises had the best evidence for long-term benefit after hip or knee replacement, but the evidence is thin and no study in the review was actually delivered by an occupational therapist.

Key findings

01Two of five task-oriented exercise studies found significantly better pain and function scores at 1 year after joint replacement; the other three found no significant difference from control.

02Water-based exercise after knee replacement was not associated with improvements in pain, function, or stair climbing power at 6 months.

03No included study was delivered by an occupational therapy practitioner, and none measured prescription opioid use as an outcome.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Only 7 studies were included, and their heterogeneity in surgery type, intervention dosage, setting, and outcome measures made meta-analysis impossible. No study in the review was actually delivered by an occupational therapy practitioner, so the findings do not directly evidence OT's role. No study measured prescription opioid use as an outcome, despite this being a stated secondary objective. English-language publications only; gray literature was not searched, so unpublished null results may be missing. The exclusion of interventions without a functional or occupational component (CPM, isolated muscle training, modalities without functional training) may have omitted preparatory work that contributes to recovery. Three of the five task-oriented exercise studies found no significant difference, so the two positive results should not be read as a consistent effect.

Declared interests

No conflicts of interest were reported by the authors or by any individuals in control of the article's content.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the two positive task-oriented exercise studies as proof that this approach reliably improves outcomes after joint replacement. Three of the five task-oriented studies found no significant difference, the overall evidence is rated low to moderate, and none of the seven studies was actually delivered by an occupational therapist.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →