PTSurveyJournal of physical therapy science2021

Changes in availability and usage of electrophysical agents by physical therapists: a 5 year longitudinal follow-up study.

Yuichi Abe

PMID 34776625

WHAT IT FOUND

Electrophysical agent use in Japan did not decline overall.

Hot packs, ultrasound and cold packs remained common but dropped slightly. Traction and CPM devices were available but rarely used. Ultrasound imaging and electrotherapy saw increased usage. Clinicians with under 10 years' experience reported more confidence than senior colleagues.

Key findings

01Use of core modalities like hot packs, ultrasound and cold packs decreased slightly, while traction and CPM devices remained available but were used by fewer than half of respondents.

02Availability and usage of ultrasound imaging increased, as did usage of iontophoresis and magnetic field therapy, though these started from very low availability.

03Clinicians with 10 years or less of experience reported higher confidence in using several modalities compared to those with 11 or more years.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study was limited to one prefecture in Japan, so findings may not apply to other countries or regions. Response rates dropped from 71% in 2014 to 63% in 2019, which may introduce bias. Self-reported availability and usage are not verified against actual clinical records. The large percentage changes in usage for modalities with very low availability (like magnetic field therapy) may be unstable due to small denominators.

Declared interests

The author reports no conflict of interest. The study was supported by a grant from Nagano University of Health and Medicine.

The easy way to misread this

Do not interpret the increase in usage for iontophoresis and magnetic field therapy as evidence they are becoming mainstream treatments. Their availability remained below 2%, so the large percentage rise in usage occurred within a very small group of therapists who had access to these devices.

Read it on PubMed →