RNMeta-AnalysisRevista latino-americana de enfermagem2018

Catheter-directed thrombolysis for patients with acute lower extremity deep vein thrombosis: a meta-analysis.

Wang Li, Zhang Chuanlin, Mu Shaoyu and 3 others

PMID 29947719

WHAT IT FOUND

In acute lower extremity DVT, catheter-directed thrombolysis plus anticoagulation was linked to less post-thrombotic syndrome and better vein patency than anticoagulation alone, but rethrombosis did not differ.

Most evidence was case series.

Key findings

01In comparison studies where CDT was given with anticoagulation, the CDT plus anticoagulation arm had lower odds of post-thrombotic syndrome (OR 0.38, 95%CI 0.26-0.55, p<0.0001) and higher 6-month patency (OR 4.76, 95%CI 2.14-10.56, p<0.0001) than anticoagulation alone.

02In case series of CDT, with or without anticoagulation or stent, pooled proportions were PTS 0.10 (0.08, 0.12), patency 0.87 (0.85, 0.89), complete lysis 0.58 (0.40, 0.75), and rethrombosis 0.11 (0.06, 0.17).

03Rethrombosis did not differ between CDT plus anticoagulation and anticoagulation alone in the two comparison studies reporting it (OR 0.55, 95%CI 0.04-5.42, p>0,05).

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Most included studies were case series without a comparison group, so they cannot show that CDT caused the outcomes. Almost half of the studies were retrospective, so recall bias cannot be ruled out. Patency data were affected by publication bias, likely because positive CDT results are more likely to be published. Only peer-reviewed English studies were included. Heterogeneity was high for complete lysis and rethrombosis. The comparison analyses were based on a small number of studies for each outcome. Because CDT was given with anticoagulation, and sometimes with stent placement, the contribution of any single component cannot be separated.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that catheter-directed thrombolysis alone is proven better than anticoagulation for all acute leg DVT. The treatment arm included anticoagulation, and sometimes stent placement, so the contribution of any single component cannot be separated. Also, many studies were case series without controls, rethrombosis did not improve, and patency was affected by publication bias.

Read it on PubMed →