Case Report: Benefits of LSVT LOUD in a multilingual patient with hypokinetic-hyperkinetic dysarthria and suspected progressive supranuclear palsy.
Amanda Sebestyen, Allison Hilger, Holly Kleiber
PMID 39091567WHAT IT FOUND
One multilingual man with suspected progressive supranuclear palsy had louder, clearer speech after 16 LSVT sessions, and his spouse reported better communication.
Three months later, vocal quality and intelligibility remained, but loudness and reported communication benefit did not.
Key findings
01After treatment, mean intensity increased by 2.53 dB overall, including 7.91 dB for sustained phonation and 5.20 dB for sentence repetition, while conversation decreased by 2.34 dB.
02At three-month testing, mean intensity decreased by 15.98 dB from post-treatment and fell across all tasks, while a vocal quality measure, smooth cepstral peak prominence, was maintained by 0.34 dB overall.
03Perceived intelligibility increased by 5.10% post-treatment from 87.21% at baseline, and was 92.92% at three-month testing.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
This is one patient, so it cannot show what will happen for other multilingual patients or other people with suspected progressive supranuclear palsy. The diagnosis was suspected atypical progressive supranuclear palsy, and the paper does not report a confirmed diagnosis. Baseline intelligibility was already 87.21%, so the reported 5.10% increase was small and its interval included no increase. The paper reports no control group and does not report blinding of outcome assessors, so change cannot be separated from practice, disease progression, or measurement variation. Treatment and testing were mainly in English, while OP's native language was French, so generalization to French was not measured. Homework adherence was based on patient report, and OP stopped daily homework before follow-up, making it hard to know whether lost maintenance was due to treatment, disease progression, or reduced practice. Before LSVT, OP had received therapy targeting inspiratory and expiratory muscle strength, attention and memory strategies, word-finding compensations, sleep and exercise, cognitive and language activities, follow-up questions, and response expansion; the paper does not separate these earlier components from LSVT. The only daily communication report was from OP and their spouse, with no independent observer or listener rating of everyday communication.
Declared interests
The authors declare no financial support was received for the research, authorship, or publication.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read this as evidence that LSVT LOUD treats suspected progressive supranuclear palsy. It describes one patient, and the post-treatment gains in loudness and reported communication effectiveness were not maintained at three months.