Brief Report: Calculation and Convergent and Divergent Validity of a New ADOS-2 Expressive Language Score.
Micah O Mazurek, Mary Baker-Ericzén, Stephen M Kanne
PMID 31512950WHAT IT FOUND
A brief expressive language score from a standard autism diagnostic observation tool tracked spoken language across parent, clinician, and direct tests, and was less tied to understanding or nonverbal ability.
It may characterize speech level, but is not a full language assessment.
Key findings
01The new expressive language score showed moderate to large associations with other expressive language measures.
02The score was more strongly related to expressive language measures than to receptive language or nonverbal cognitive ability.
03The score was correlated with age and IQ, but age did not remove its associations with expressive language measures.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The study did not include a comprehensive language evaluation or natural speech samples, so it cannot show how the score performs in full speech-language assessment. The ADOS-2 expressive language score should not replace a full language assessment, especially for diagnosis. The sample was 82.1% male and 81.1% Caucasian, so results may not represent girls, boys from other racial or ethnic groups, or families from other backgrounds. No children were administered ADOS-2 Module 4, so the score was not tested in that group. Only 103 children completed the parent report of words produced, so evidence for that comparison is narrower than for the whole sample. Clinicians rated verbal communication using all available information, including ADOS-2 performance, so the clinician rating was not fully independent of the new score. The score may be less sensitive for older children or children with complex speech because the ADOS-2 gives fewer expressive language distinctions in later modules. The study did not test children without autism or children with other developmental disorders.
The easy way to misread this
Do not use this score as a stand-alone speech-language evaluation. It is a brief descriptive score, and the paper states it should not replace a comprehensive language assessment, especially during diagnosis.