Brainstem Evoked Potential Indices of Subcortical Auditory Processing After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.
Kathy R Vander Werff, Brian Rieger
PMID 28319479WHAT IT FOUND
Brainstem auditory responses did not differ overall between 32 people with mild traumatic brain injury and 32 controls.
Differences appeared only in the subgroup with abnormal auditory test performance, who were older and had slightly worse hearing thresholds.
Key findings
01When all participants were compared together, brainstem responses to clicks and speech did not show significant differences between the mild traumatic brain injury group and controls.
02Abnormal auditory behavioral test results were common after mild traumatic brain injury: 22 of 32 participants had one or more abnormal results, compared with 6 of 32 controls.
03In the subgroup of 9 mild traumatic brain injury participants with abnormal auditory behavioral results, click brainstem latencies were delayed and speech brainstem responses showed reduced amplitudes and delayed latencies compared with controls, but this subgroup was older than the other mild traumatic brain injury subgroup and controls.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The study included 32 people with mild traumatic brain injury and 32 controls, and the subgroup with abnormal auditory behavioral results was only 9 people after excluding 4 for unreliable effort. Many comparisons were not corrected for multiple testing, so some significant results could have occurred by chance. The abnormal-performance subgroup was older than the other mild traumatic brain injury subgroup and controls, and it also had a higher right-ear pure-tone average than controls, so age and mild hearing differences may have contributed to the brainstem response differences. The auditory test battery did not include all tests recommended for diagnosing central auditory processing disorder, so the behavioral classification may not capture every auditory processing problem. Some brainstem recordings were excluded because of artifact, and no formal assessment was made of whether participants were asleep or relaxed during testing.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that mild traumatic brain injury causes a reliable brainstem auditory processing abnormality. At the whole-group level, click and speech brainstem responses did not differ significantly between the mild traumatic brain injury group and controls. The significant differences appeared only in a small subgroup with abnormal auditory behavioral tests, and that subgroup was older and had slightly worse right-ear hearing thresholds than controls.