Biomarkers of stroke recovery using EEG-based resting-state functional connectivity: a systematic review.
Ettore Napoli, Fabio Masina, Rachele Pezzetta and 7 others
PMID 41845449WHAT IT FOUND
EEG resting-state connectivity shows inconsistent links to stroke recovery.
Studies were heterogeneous and mostly descriptive, so no single measure is a validated clinical biomarker.
Key findings
01The review included studies of adult stroke patients that used EEG resting-state functional connectivity.
02Extreme heterogeneity in methods and metrics prevented pooled effect sizes or a unified gold-standard metric.
03The authors state that reported associations are potential mechanistic insights, not validated clinical biomarkers ready for immediate translation.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The review included only English peer-reviewed articles from major databases, so relevant work in other languages or grey literature may be missing. The included studies used very different EEG processing, connectivity metrics, frequency bands, sensor or source analyses, and patient characteristics, so findings could not be pooled into a single effect estimate. Many studies were small, lacked healthy control groups, and did not stratify patients by cortical or subcortical lesion location, making it hard to separate genuine recovery effects from methodological or patient differences. Longitudinal studies often compared only before and after rehabilitation within the same group, so changes may reflect spontaneous recovery, training, or both. The supplied text reports 30 included articles in the selection results but refers to 31 included studies in a later synthesis table, so the exact number of studies is unclear.
The easy way to misread this
Do not treat EEG resting-state connectivity as a validated clinical biomarker for stroke recovery. The review found heterogeneous, mostly group-level associations and says these findings are not ready for immediate clinical translation.
Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →