SLPRCTDysphagia2025

Biofeedback and Exercise Load Affect Accuracy of Tongue Strength Exercise Performance.

Erin Kamarunas, Kelsey Murray, Teresa Drulia and 3 others

PMID 39154305

WHAT IT FOUND

How accurately older adults hit their tongue strength exercise targets did not predict their strength gains; only age did, with older people improving less.

Maximum-effort exercise was performed more accurately than submaximal exercise, and biofeedback helped people recall the target but lowered home adherence.

Key findings

01None of the three exercise accuracy measures predicted change in tongue pressure. Age was the only predictor, with older participants improving less, and the model explained 8% of the variance in pressure change.

02Maximum-intensity exercise was performed more accurately than submaximal exercise on all three accuracy measures: closer to the target on retention checks, fewer practice pushes needed to reach competency, and a higher proportion of home pushes within the target range.

03Biofeedback improved how close people came to their target when re-tested two weeks after training, but did not improve accuracy during training sessions, and people who used biofeedback at home completed slightly fewer of their prescribed repetitions.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The participants were healthy older adults with no swallowing difficulty and no diagnosed weakness of the tongue, so the results say nothing directly about people with dysphagia or reduced tongue strength. All of the regression models explained only a small amount of the variation in outcomes (4.4% to 8.0%), so the predictors found are weak. Home exercise accuracy and adherence were self-reported on a log, which may not reflect what people actually did. Home accuracy could only be measured in the groups who had biofeedback, so there is no comparison with the groups exercising without it. The confidence and motivation questions were worded in a positive direction and were often asked by the same investigator who trained the participants, which may have pushed answers upward. The study looked at one exercise only (tongue strength exercise), and split intensity into just two levels, so it cannot say anything about other swallowing exercises or other dose levels. Only one form of biofeedback (visual display on a tablet) was used, so different feedback types might behave differently.

Declared interests

The paper names Encompass Therapies as the funder. The text supplied does not state what role the funder had in designing, running or writing up the study, and no other conflicts are declared.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that hitting the exercise target does not matter for your patients. These participants had no swallowing problem and were already accurate, with 96.4% of training pushes and 95.5% of home pushes inside the target range. Nothing here tells you what happens in patients with weak tongues or fatigue, which the authors say still needs testing.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →