Behavior-Change Intervention Targeting Physical Function, Walking, and Disability After Dysvascular Amputation: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial.
Cory L Christiansen, Matthew J Miller, Amanda M Murray and 4 others
PMID 29746823WHAT IT FOUND
The main chair-to-walk timing test did not improve more with the behavior-change telephone program than with control calls.
The behavior-change group increased daily steps and reduced sitting time, but this small pilot does not prove better function.
Key findings
01The primary timed chair-to-walk test did not improve more in one group than the other.
02The behavior-change group increased daily step counts more than the control group at 12 weeks, with mean daily steps of 1305 at baseline and 2439 at 12 weeks.
03At 24 weeks, the behavior-change group reduced sedentary time compared with the control group.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The study was a small pilot, so it had limited power to detect differences in secondary outcomes. Multiple secondary outcomes were reported without adjustment for multiple comparisons. Participants chose their own weekly goals, so exercise and functional training were not targeted equally across people. The intervention was a bundle of education, goal setting, self-monitoring, feedback, and planning, so the contribution of any single part cannot be separated. Outcome assessors were blinded, but participants and therapists were not. Two participants were lost to follow-up, and some could not complete performance measures because of illness. No direct measurement of intervention fidelity was made. Control group exercise behavior was not tracked except step count. TUG variability was higher than expected, limiting ability to identify group differences. Accelerometer activity intensity may not equal direct energy expenditure.
Declared interests
The work was funded by NIH grants K12 HD055931 and NIH/NCATS UL1-TR001082. Author disclosures state no previous presentation, manuscript, abstract, or conference presentation of the research.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that the behavior-change telephone program improves physical function or disability. The primary timed chair-to-walk test showed no difference between groups, and the step-count gain came from a small pilot with self-selected goals.