PTSurveyThe South African journal of physiotherapy2023

Becoming comfortable with the uncomfortable: The tale of adaptability.

Anke van der Merwe, Roline Barnes, Mariette Nel

PMID 37415854

WHAT IT FOUND

Self-reported adaptability was highest in interpersonal and cultural areas, but work stress was lowest at 12.5 of 25 among eight of 28 approached final-year physiotherapy students.

Responses were mixed about uncertainty, with many preferring stable conditions.

Key findings

01The median score for handling work stress was the lowest, 12.5 of 25.

02The highest scores were for interpersonal adaptability, 85.7%, and cultural adaptability, 84%, while 62.5% were neutral about enjoying learning other cultures.

03Responses were inconsistent about uncertainty: 75% agreed they could make effective decisions without all relevant information, but 62.5% became frustrated when things were unpredictable.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Only 8 of 28 approached students responded, so the results may not represent final-year physiotherapy students at this university. The study used self-reported questionnaire scores, had no comparison group, and had no normative values, so it cannot show what actually improves adaptability. It was done at one university with final-year physiotherapy students, so it may not apply to other years, professions or settings. Closed-ended questions did not allow participants to explain their answers, and the authors suggest over-surveying may have contributed to the low response.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that final-year physiotherapy students are prepared for unpredictable clinical work. Only eight of 28 approached responded, the scores were self-reported, there were no normative values, and work stress was the lowest dimension at 12.5 of 25.

Read it on PubMed →