SLPOtherAutism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research2022

Autistic people outperform neurotypicals in a cartoon version of the Reading the Mind in the Eyes.

Liam Cross, Andrea Piovesan, Gray Atherton

PMID 35855595

WHAT IT FOUND

Autistic adults matched neurotypicals on the standard Reading the Mind in the Eyes test but outperformed them on a cartoon version.

Neurotypicals scored worse on cartoons, while autistic performance remained consistent across both formats.

Key findings

01Autistic adults scored higher than neurotypicals on the cartoon version of the emotion recognition task.

02Neurotypicals performed significantly worse on the cartoon task compared to the standard human-photograph task.

03There was no significant difference in performance between autistic and neurotypical groups on the standard human-photograph task.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The sample was heavily skewed towards females (71.9% of total participants), which may have boosted autistic performance given known female advantages in this task. Diagnoses were self-reported and confirmed only by the participant's statement that a medical professional had made them, without clinical verification. No data was collected on intelligence, comorbidities, or symptom severity, which are known to influence social cognition test performance. The study relied on an online convenience sample recruited via autism forums, which may not represent the broader autistic population.

Declared interests

The authors declared no conflicts of interest and no financial interest to report.

The easy way to misread this

Do not interpret the autistic outperformance on cartoons as evidence that they are generally better at reading emotions. The neurotypical group performed poorly on cartoons, and the autistic group's performance did not improve relative to their own baseline on human photos, suggesting the result reflects a lack of human-specific bias in NTs rather than a superior social skill in autistic people.

Read it on PubMed →