OTQualitativeAutism : the international journal of research and practice2025

Autistic-led insights on airport accessibility: A retrospective analysis of environmental assessments.

Chris Edwards, Abigail Ma Love, Ru Ying Cai and 3 others

PMID 40340572

WHAT IT FOUND

Autistic consultants identified quiet rooms, soundproofing, and clear visual signage as key airport supports.

They flagged reflective surfaces, sudden noises, strong scents, and confusing queues as major barriers. Pre-travel digital guides and consistent wayfinding help reduce anxiety for travelers.

Key findings

01Sensory barriers include reflective surfaces, harsh lighting, unpredictable noises, and strong scents, while enablers include quiet rooms, soundproofing, and matte finishes.

02Communication and predictability are critical, with enablers being clear pre-travel digital resources, visual aids for security, and consistent high-contrast signage.

03Crowd management strategies like defined queuing systems and accessible lanes help, while disorganized crowds and lack of seating create chaos and discomfort.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study relied on reports from a small pool of four Autistic consultants, which may reflect shared perspectives rather than the full diversity of Autistic experiences. The Aspect Autism Friendly Framework used for assessments is not peer-reviewed and evolved over time, potentially affecting data consistency between earlier and later reports. The research team and the consultants who wrote the reports worked for the same organization (Aspect), which may introduce bias despite independent analysis. The study did not include direct feedback from Autistic travelers, only consultant observations. Site-specific differences in airport layout and operations mean findings may not generalize to all airports.

Declared interests

The research was supported by Aspect (Autism Spectrum Australia). The environmental assessments analyzed were produced as a financial service by the Aspect Autism Friendly team, which operates within the same organization as the research team (ARCAP). Members of the Aspect team provided feedback on the manuscript but were not involved in the data analysis.

The easy way to misread this

Do not interpret these findings as evidence that specific airport interventions improve clinical outcomes or reduce distress in patients. This is a descriptive analysis of environmental features identified by consultants, not a trial of an intervention's effectiveness.

Read it on PubMed →