Associations Between Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Audiometric Hearing: Findings From the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging.
Paul Thomas Mick, Rasel Kabir, Margaret Kathleen Pichora-Fuller and 5 others
PMID 37122082WHAT IT FOUND
Higher blood pressure and overall cardiovascular risk were linked to faster hearing-test decline over follow-up in both sexes.
Diabetes, current smoking, and more risk factors were linked to worse baseline hearing. These are associations, not proof that treating risk factors prevents hearing loss.
Key findings
01Diabetes, current smoking, and higher composite cardiovascular risk were independently associated with worse baseline hearing in both sexes.
02Hypertension and higher general cardiovascular risk function scores were associated with faster hearing decline over follow-up in both sexes.
03The sex pattern differed: obesity and more risk factors predicted faster decline in females, while former and current smoking predicted faster decline in males.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
This was an observational study, so it can show associations but cannot prove that cardiovascular risk factors cause hearing loss or that treating them will change hearing. Noise exposure and occupational history were not adjusted for, and both can affect cardiovascular disease and hearing. The main results used 21,492 participants with complete data; those with missing data were older, had lower socioeconomic status, and had worse baseline hearing, so the analysed group may not represent people most at risk. The CLSA excluded people in institutions, northern territories, First Nations settlements, full-time Canadian Armed Forces members, people with perceived cognitive impairment, and people unable to respond in English or French, and the overall response rate was 10%. The cohort was relatively privileged and 94% identified as white, so findings may not apply to populations with different risk profiles or less access to care. Follow-up was only about 3 years, and the study did not know how long participants had had each risk factor or how their risk changed over time. Hearing was measured with screening audiometry in quiet rooms but not soundproof booths, and some participants with non-removable devices were not tested.
Declared interests
The study received a University of Saskatchewan CoMRAD grant and an educational grant from Sonova AG for independent medical research. The funding agreement said Sonova had no right to censor or prevent publication. The authors declared no conflicts.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that treating cardiovascular risk factors will prevent or slow hearing loss. This was an observational association study, it did not test treatment, and the authors state the design does not support causal interpretation.