RNCohortJournal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN2025

Associations Among Lifetime Discrimination Typologies and Psychological Health in Black and Hispanic Women After Birth.

Jihye Kim Scroggins, Maxim Topaz, Se Hee Min and 1 others

PMID 39197482

WHAT IT FOUND

In Hispanic women, postpartum depression differences by lifetime discrimination pattern were not found; stress was higher, and Black women had higher depression and stress.

Key findings

01Lifetime discrimination typologies were associated with higher postpartum stress in both groups, and with higher postpartum depression in Black women; in Hispanic women, depression differences were not statistically significant.

02Black women were grouped into three lifetime discrimination typologies: no lifetime discrimination (76.2%), high childhood-family racial discrimination (16.6%), and moderate lifetime discrimination (7.2%).

03Hispanic women were grouped into three typologies: no lifetime discrimination (81.2%), high childhood-family racial discrimination (15.3%), and high education discrimination (3.5%).

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

This was a secondary analysis of existing cohort data, not a trial of discrimination screening or postpartum mental health care. The analysis is observational, so it cannot show that discrimination caused worse postpartum depression or stress. White women were not included, so the findings cannot show how discrimination patterns compare across all racial and ethnic groups. The data came from women enrolled between 2008 and 2010, so they may not reflect recent discrimination experiences. Race and ethnicity categories were mutually exclusive, so the analysis could not distinguish groups such as Hispanic Black or Hispanic White women. Latent class analysis assigned women to typologies by probability, so the groups may not perfectly match real-life categories. There was missing data, with perceived stress missing for 9.4% of participants, and no imputation was done. The Hispanic outcome models had a reported power of 0.78, and the authors noted decreased power may have contributed to non-significant findings.

Declared interests

The authors report no conflicts of interest or relevant financial relationships.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read this as proof that discrimination caused worse postpartum depression or stress, or that asking about discrimination will improve outcomes. It is an observational secondary analysis of existing data, and it did not test a treatment or screening intervention.

Read it on PubMed →