Association of Race, Ethnicity, and Gender to Disparities in Functional Recovery and Social Health After Major Lower Limb Amputation: A Cross-sectional Pilot Study.
Sheila M Clemens, Kiarri N Kershaw, Zoran Bursac and 1 others
PMID 37866483WHAT IT FOUND
Among 56 prosthetic leg users with vascular amputations, White men had the best mobility and social participation scores.
Women and Persons of Color scored lower, especially Women of Color, despite similar amputation factors.
Key findings
01White participants scored higher than Persons of Color on all four outcome measures, and men scored better than women on three functional mobility measures.
02White men had the best scores on all four measures.
03Highest income participants scored 11.42 points better than lowest income participants on PLUS-M perceived mobility and 8.68 points better on PROMIS social health.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
This was a pilot study with 56 participants, so it is better for estimating associations than for proving causes. The sample was convenience-based and recruited from clinic sites, and the authors said generalizability is premature. The study grouped many racial and ethnic identities together as Persons of Color, which may hide differences within that group. The study excluded people with lower limb amputation who did not use a prosthesis daily, so it may miss a more vulnerable group. Four participants who did not report income were recategorized to the median income level. Some group differences did not reach statistical significance, and the regression models explained only small parts of the outcome scores. The gender categories used were male and female, which the authors said are not appropriate for current gender descriptors.
Declared interests
The authors reported no conflicts of interest. The article is marked as supported by non-U.S. government and NIH extramural research funding.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read the lower scores in Women of Color as proof that gender, race-ethnicity, or income cause worse recovery. This was a cross-sectional pilot study with 56 people, no treatment was tested, and the authors said generalizability is premature.