Assessment of medical morbidities in a rhesus monkey model of naturally occurring low sociality.
Adam K Myers, Catherine F Talbot, Laura A Del Rosso and 5 others
PMID 33847078WHAT IT FOUND
Male rhesus monkeys classified as naturally low-social suffered significantly higher rates of trauma and more total injuries than socially competent peers.
No differences were found in gastrointestinal, inflammation, or other medical morbidities. This supports the validity of this animal model for studying ASD-related physical risks.
Key findings
01Low-social monkeys incurred higher rates of trauma than high-social monkeys, and no other morbidity types differed by group.
02Nonsocial equivalence scores and mSRS-R scores significantly and positively predicted trauma rates and total injuries received.
03Group differences were not found for the number of injuries per event or the mean severity per injury.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTsWhat it means for SLPs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The study included only male monkeys, so findings may not apply to females. The low-social group may not have consistently represented the behavioral extreme of social functioning, potentially affecting non-trauma morbidity results. The etiology of traumatic injuries was difficult to fully account for without constant observation, leading to potential over- or under-representation of specific injury types. Psychological stress and personality factors could not be measured, which are known to influence health outcomes in monkeys. The study design cannot confirm causality; it is possible that a history of being attacked leads to social withdrawal rather than low sociality leading to attacks.
Declared interests
All authors declare no conflict of interest.
The easy way to misread this
Do not interpret the increased trauma rates in low-social monkeys as evidence that human patients with ASD are inherently more prone to self-injury or unintentional accidents. The study notes that injuries in these monkeys arose most consistently from intentional external sources (aggression from other monkeys), and the animal model's relevance to specific human injury etiologies is complex.