SLPOtherDysphagia2026

Assessment of Hyoid Bone Movement by Simultaneous Ultrasound and Videofluoroscopic Imaging.

Nicholas S Schoenleb, Brittany N Krekeler, Anna K Hopkins and 4 others

PMID 41874650

WHAT IT FOUND

Handheld submental ultrasound tracked the hyoid through swallowing and, once the probe's own movement was corrected frame by frame, matched simultaneous videofluoroscopy closely.

Correcting only for the starting angle did not. Uncorrected probe movement alone adds an estimated 0.37 cm of error.

Key findings

01Ultrasound held under the chin tracked the hyoid through a swallow and, once the probe's own movement was corrected frame by frame, agreed closely with videofluoroscopy recorded at the same time (ICC 0.891; average error 0.3795 cm).

02Correcting only for the probe's starting angle was not enough: agreement with videofluoroscopy was poor to moderate (ICC 0.503), and hyoid excursion and peak velocity measured this way differed significantly from videofluoroscopy.

03The probe is not still during a swallow. Its average angle was 24.48 degrees from horizontal, and the authors estimate that uncorrected probe movement alone contributes 0.37 cm to the error in measured hyoid position.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

About one third of the recordings that were successfully lined up in time (28 of 84) could not be used, mostly because the hyoid moved out of the ultrasound image or was too blurred to track. Only 56 of the 92 possible 5 ml swallows were analyzable, so the ultrasound method failed on a large share of attempts. The probe was placed after the bolus was already in the mouth, so the hyoid's earliest movement as it prepared for the bolus was probably missed. Only 19 people were analysed, all referred for a clinical swallow study at one centre, with a wide range of swallowing problems and severities; most were not aspirating. The motion correction that made ultrasound accurate depended on the videofluoroscopy images to measure the probe, so this is not yet a method that stands alone at the bedside. The comparison between people who aspirated and those who did not rests on very few participants and the authors themselves call it exploratory and say it should be read with caution. Hyoid velocity numbers cannot be compared directly between studies, because different ways of calculating and smoothing the data give different values.

Declared interests

Funding came from the National Institute on Aging and the College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati. The text provided contains no other declaration of competing interests, and nothing stating a sponsor's role in the design, analysis or writing.

The easy way to misread this

Do not turn the finding that people who aspirated had larger hyoid excursions and faster hyoid movement into a clinical rule. Only 3 of the 19 participants aspirated, the authors describe it as an exploratory trend, and the opposite pattern has been reported in conditions such as myopathy. This study does not show that bigger hyoid movement means safer or less safe swallowing.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →