RNMeta-AnalysisJournal of clinical nursing2026

Assessing the Effectiveness of Interventions Implemented by Nurses to Reduce Medication Administration Errors in Hospitalised Acute Adult Patient Settings: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Angela Uche Eze, Takawira Marufu, Albert Amagyei and 3 others

PMID 41031474

WHAT IT FOUND

Nurse-implemented interventions lowered medication administration errors overall, but the evidence is uneven.

Smart workflow technologies showed the clearest benefit. Education, electronic medication systems and low-resource ward interventions did not show a clear overall benefit.

Key findings

01Across 14 studies, nurse-implemented interventions reduced medication administration errors compared with no intervention (odds ratio 0.70, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.97).

02In subgroup analysis, workflow smart technologies showed a significant reduction (odds ratio 0.62, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.91), while electronic medication management, educational interventions and low-resource ward-based interventions were not statistically significant.

03The pooled estimate came from highly heterogeneous studies (I2 = 94%) and the funnel plot suggested possible publication bias.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The pooled analysis combined randomised and non-randomised studies, and all included studies had at least one risk of bias element. Most studies used direct observation without blinding to outcomes, and many were before-and-after or quasi-experimental designs. Heterogeneity was very high (I2 = 94%), so the average effect may not apply to any one ward. The funnel plot was asymmetric, indicating possible publication bias. Studies used different definitions and reporting standards for medication administration errors, making comparison difficult. Only English-language studies were included. The paper reports inconsistent participant counts for the meta-analysis (2034 in one place and 35,046 in another). Several interventions were multicomponent, so the effect of a single part cannot be isolated.

Declared interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The first author conducted this review through a NIHR/NHSE East Midlands Clinical Academic Internship.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that any nurse-led intervention reliably reduces medication administration errors in adult acute wards. The overall pooled reduction was based on highly heterogeneous studies, had possible publication bias, and only the workflow smart technologies subgroup reached statistical significance.

Read it on PubMed →