PTOtherJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2019

Applying LDA-based pattern recognition to predict isometric shoulder and elbow torque generation in individuals with chronic stroke with moderate to severe motor impairment.

Joseph V Kopke, Levi J Hargrove, Michael D Ellis

PMID 30836971

WHAT IT FOUND

For 20 of 29 people with chronic stroke, a sensor measuring arm forces identified intended shoulder and elbow effort above 90%.

Errors clustered between adduction and internal rotation, and abduction and external rotation.

Key findings

01The combined EMG and load cell classifier averaged 92% accuracy, compared with 91% for load cell alone and 83% for EMG alone.

02The load cell classifier was accurate above 90% for 20 of 29 participants.

03Errors were concentrated between shoulder adduction and internal rotation, and between shoulder abduction and external rotation; these four directions had the lowest average accuracies.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Only 29 of 35 recruited participants were analysed, and six were excluded for corrupted data or profound external rotation weakness, so results do not apply to people who cannot produce external rotation torque. The task was maximum isometric torque in a supported, casted arm, not functional reaching or a real-time wearable device. Classification was tested with recorded data and trial-wise cross-validation, so it does not show how a device would perform during therapy. EMG was recorded from eight major upper-extremity muscles but not rotator-cuff muscles, which the authors say may have limited accuracy. Some participants were very inaccurate in the four most confused directions, including internal rotation as low as 3%. No significant correlation was found between accuracy and Fugl-Meyer score or reaching distance, so the study does not explain which patients would be best classified.

Declared interests

The supplied publication types list NIH extramural research support. No author conflict-of-interest declaration is provided.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that a wearable shoulder device can now be controlled during daily reaching. This was a test of recorded isometric torque data in a supported, casted arm, and only 20 of 29 participants were classified above 90% by the load cell classifier.

Read it on PubMed →