Aphasia and literacy-the insider's perspective.
Emma Kjellén, Katja Laakso, Ingrid Henriksson
PMID 28039933WHAT IT FOUND
People with aphasia described reading and writing as an ongoing recovery process.
They practised literacy for communication, information and pleasure, and wanted therapy to be meaningful, individual and tied to everyday life.
Key findings
01People with post-stroke aphasia described literacy as an ongoing recovery process in which skills could improve over time.
02Participants said they used reading and writing to communicate, get information, remember things, and for pleasure.
03Participants wanted literacy therapy to be meaningful, continuous, varied and at an appropriate difficulty level, not repetitive.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The sample was 12 participants, so themes cannot be assumed to apply to all people with aphasia. Participants were selected to be able to take part in an audio-recorded interview in Swedish, except one participant with severe aphasia, so people with more severe aphasia or who cannot participate in interviews may be underrepresented. The authors were speech-language therapists, which may have shaped interpretation, although it also helped communication with participants. Interviews were audio-recorded, not video-recorded, so non-verbal communication may have been missed. No respondent validation was used. Detailed language assessment scores were not an inclusion criterion or focus, so findings are about experience, not measured literacy ability. The study was conducted in Sweden and quotations are translations, so cultural and language context may limit transferability. The study did not test an intervention, so it cannot show whether literacy therapy improves skills.
Declared interests
The article text does not report funding or conflicts of interest.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read this as proof that literacy practice improves recovery. It reports what people with aphasia said about reading and writing, not a measured treatment effect.