RNCase ReportJournal of hospice and palliative nursing : JHPN : the official journal of the Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association2017

Animal Assisted Interactions to Alleviate Psychological Symptoms in Patients on Mechanical Ventilation.

Breanna Hetland, Tanya Bailey, Maryjo Prince-Paul

PMID 29276432

WHAT IT FOUND

A 76-year-old man on mechanical ventilation who had withdrawn from care engaged with a therapy dog visit.

He opened his eyes, petted the dog, and later participated in physical therapy with the animal present. This is one person, not a pattern.

Key findings

01The patient, who had refused to acknowledge family or staff and would not participate in physical therapy, engaged with an animal-assisted interaction team, opening his eyes and reaching out to pet the dog.

02Subsequent visits were arranged in conjunction with scheduled physical therapy sessions, and by transfer from the ICU the patient was actively interacting with the dog.

03Nurses are identified as key initiators for animal-assisted interactions by asking patients and families about pet ownership and desire for animal contact.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

This is a single case report. It describes what happened to one person and cannot demonstrate that AAI works for other patients or that it caused the observed engagement. The patient had a specific, strong attachment to dogs at home, which may not be generalizable to patients without a history of pet ownership or who fear animals. There is no control group or comparison to standard care, so it is impossible to know if the patient's improvement in engagement was due to the dog, the timing of his recovery, or other concurrent treatments. The outcomes are subjective observations by staff and family reports, not standardized psychological or functional measures.

Declared interests

The paper does not list any conflicts of interest or funding sources.

The easy way to misread this

Do not interpret this case as evidence that animal-assisted therapy is effective for treating psychological symptoms in mechanically ventilated patients. This is a single case report describing one patient's response to a visit from a dog he likely recognized or connected with based on his history. It does not prove causality or generalizability.

Read it on PubMed →