SLPOtherTrends in hearing2019

Analyzing the Time Course of Pupillometric Data.

Jacolien van Rij, Petra Hendriks, Hedderik van Rijn and 2 others

PMID 31081486

WHAT IT FOUND

Pupil size over time can show false effects if the analysis ignores each trial's individual pattern.

For speech research, check that the analysis followed the real pupil curves before trusting a result.

Key findings

01Analyzing pupil size over time can produce effects that are not real when the analysis does not account for the fact that measurements within one trial are linked.

02In the example language data, making the analysis follow each individual pupil trace removed the picture-sentence match difference when the actor was introduced second, while the actor-first difference remained.

03The authors found that making the analysis follow each individual pupil curve is more important than adding a correction for linked measurements.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they found

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The paper is a methods tutorial, not a clinical study, so it does not test treatment outcomes or patient populations. The pupil-dilation example used native Dutch participants and existing experimental data, so it does not show what pupil size means in clinical speech or hearing assessment. The analysis depends on specialized statistical modeling and software, and the authors note that the best model may be computationally demanding for larger data sets. The authors state that the problem of linked measurements is not limited to their method and applies to other time-course analyses.

Declared interests

The supplied text lists funding from the Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung and the Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek. It does not report a competing-interests statement.

The easy way to misread this

Do not treat the pupil-size differences as evidence for a clinical test or therapy. This paper is a methods tutorial, and the example results changed after the analysis was corrected.

Read it on PubMed →