SLPSurveyJournal of autism and developmental disorders2019

An International Survey of Parental Attitudes to Technology Use by Their Autistic Children at Home.

Margaret Holmes Laurie, Petra Warreyn, Blanca Villamía Uriarte and 2 others

PMID 30536113

WHAT IT FOUND

Parents of 388 autistic children and adults reported mainstream tablets and computers at home.

Autism-specific apps were rare, and only 5 families reported access to communication devices. Ask what devices and apps families already use before assuming communication technology is in place.

Key findings

01Parents in the 388-respondent survey reported tablets and computers as the most commonly available home devices.

02Autism-specific technology use was rare: only 5 parents reported access to communication devices, and only one autism-specific app appeared in the top ten.

03Parents who were more concerned about their child's technology use reported that their child spent longer using technology.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

All data were parent reports, so the study did not observe the child's technology use directly. Parents who were concerned about screen time may have reported different amounts of use than parents who were not concerned, and the survey cannot separate true use from reporting bias. The survey was circulated online and advertised as a survey about technology and autism, which may have attracted families already interested in technology. The study did not compare autistic children with non-autistic children, so it cannot say whether the reported use is different from typical use. Time estimates may be confounded when a child uses several devices at once, and the survey did not compare weekdays with weekends. 30 records were excluded from age-group analysis because parent-child age differences were invalid, and analyses were run only on available data for each question. Device time estimates were based on different numbers of respondents with access to each device, so the reliability varied across devices. The attitude scale used only three items after two were removed, and the survey did not explore the meaning behind parents' concerns in depth.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the low reported use of autism-specific technology as evidence that such technology is ineffective or unnecessary. This survey described parents' reported use and attitudes at home; it did not measure communication, learning, or well-being outcomes.

Read it on PubMed →