PTRCTClinical rehabilitation2024

Allied rehabilitation using caregiver-mediated exercises combined with telerehabilitation for stroke (ARMed4Stroke): A randomised controlled trial.

Marijn Mulder, Corien Dm Nikamp, Erik C Prinsen and 5 others

PMID 39091094

WHAT IT FOUND

Self-reported mobility improved in both groups but not more in the 41 subacute stroke patients who added caregiver-supervised exercises, physiotherapist check-ins, and a telerehabilitation platform to usual care over 8 weeks.

Caregivers did report better quality of life and less depression.

Key findings

01The primary outcome, the Stroke Impact Scale mobility domain (scored 0 to 100), showed no significant between-group difference at 8 weeks (B 0.8, 95% CI −6.8 to 8.5, p = 0.826).

02Caregivers in the intervention group reported better care-related quality of life (p = 0.013) and lower depression scores (p = 0.025) at 8 weeks compared with usual care.

03The trial recruited 41 dyads against a planned 72, and a futility analysis (conditional power 0.066) led the team to stop recruitment.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The trial was underpowered: 41 dyads were recruited against a target of 72, partly because of the pandemic, and a futility analysis stopped recruitment early. The primary outcome (Stroke Impact Scale mobility, 0 to 100) may have a ceiling effect in relatively mild stroke patients, making it hard to detect a real difference. A significantly higher proportion of lacunar strokes was in the intervention group, which may have affected the ceiling effect or prognosis. Total exercise time did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.221), so the intervention may not have delivered a meaningfully higher dose of training. Patients were relatively young (mean 62 years) and mostly recruited from inpatient rehabilitation, limiting generalisability to older or community-based populations. Exercise minutes were self-reported rather than objectively measured.

Declared interests

Funded by the Royal Dutch Society for Physiotherapy Scientific College (KNGF-WCF) and the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw). The authors declared no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in study design, data collection or analysis, or manuscript preparation.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the caregiver wellbeing gains or the 6-month leisure ADL improvement as evidence the programme improves patient mobility. The primary outcome was null (p = 0.826), the trial was underpowered (41 of 72 dyads recruited), and total exercise time did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.221).

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →