SLPOtherEar and hearing2017

Age-Related Differences in the Processing of Temporal Envelope and Spectral Cues in a Speech Segment.

Matthew J Goupell, Casey R Gaskins, Maureen J Shader and 3 others

PMID 28562426

WHAT IT FOUND

Older adults with normal hearing needed longer silent gaps to tell Dish and Ditch apart than younger adults.

Simulating cochlear implant processing made the contrast harder, especially when timing cues were reduced. Actual implant users were not tested.

Key findings

01Older normal-hearing participants needed 9.8 ms more silence than younger participants before hearing Ditch in unprocessed sounds.

02With fewer spectral channels, participants needed longer silence and were less able to tell Dish and Ditch apart.

03With a lower envelope cutoff, participants also needed longer silence and were less able to tell Dish and Ditch apart.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The participants had normal hearing, so the study used a vocoder to simulate cochlear implant processing rather than testing people who use implants. Only one word contrast, Dish and Ditch, was tested, so it may not show how older adults hear other speech sounds or sentences. The study included 19 younger and 15 older participants, so it cannot describe how common or large these effects are in a clinic. For some degraded conditions, participants did not clearly distinguish the words, and the analysis used a maximum 70-ms value or extrapolated curves, which can weaken age comparisons. The authors state that peripheral hearing differences may have contributed to the age-related differences.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that this study tested older cochlear implant users or proved that implant settings cause poorer speech understanding. The participants had normal hearing, and the researchers used a vocoder to simulate implant processing, not actual implants.

Read it on PubMed →