SLPOtherChild: care, health and development2016

Adapting the Bayley Scales of infant and toddler development in Ethiopia: evaluation of reliability and validity.

C Hanlon, G Medhin, B Worku and 4 others

PMID 27381579

WHAT IT FOUND

In rural Ethiopia, nurses and data collectors rated the adapted Bayley Scales with very high agreement.

Scores rose with age and were lower in stunted children, but several language and motor items were not appropriate.

Key findings

01Nurses and project data collectors rated the adapted Bayley sub-scores with very high agreement, and there was no reliability difference between the two groups.

02Mean scores were significantly lower at 30 months than at 42 months, and stunted children had significantly lower total and cognitive scores at both ages.

03Some cognitive, language and motor items were flagged as content-validity problems, including matching colours, cutting paper with scissors, identifying colours, understanding pronouns, using plurals and naming colours.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Children were only assessed at 30 and 42 months, so the study does not show that the adapted scale works across the full 1 to 42 month age range. The reliability sample was a convenience sample of children aged 2 to 3 years, not a random sample. The validation sample was chosen because birthweight was measured within 48 hours of birth. Children whose mothers lacked this measurement were more likely to be non-literate and first-time mothers. Several items were flagged as content-validity problems, especially colour, pronoun, plural and scissors-based tasks, so low scores on those items may reflect unfamiliarity rather than delay. The gross motor scale lost items because stairs were not available, and its consistency was weaker at 42 months. The study reports reliability and validity evidence, not a test of whether the adapted scale diagnoses developmental delay.

Declared interests

The authors reported no conflicts of interest. The study was part of the C-MaMiE project, which covered healthcare costs for participating mothers and children.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read this as proof that the adapted Bayley Scales diagnose developmental delay in all low-income settings. The study was done in rural Ethiopia, only at 30 and 42 months, and several items were not valid, so a low score on one item may reflect unfamiliarity with the task rather than a child's ability.

Read it on PubMed →