RNRCTJournal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society2018

A Randomized Controlled Trial Determining Variances in Ostomy Skin Conditions and the Economic Impact (ADVOCATE Trial).

Janice C Colwell, Joyce Pittman, Rose Raizman and 1 others

PMID 29300287

WHAT IT FOUND

A ceramide ostomy skin barrier lowered the average 12-week stoma-related cost by $36.46 compared with control.

Skin complication rates were 40.5% vs 55.4%, but the difference was not conclusive.

Key findings

01Adjusted average 12-week stoma-related cost was $223.73 in the treatment group and $260.19 in the control group; the reported difference was $36.46 (P = .017).

02Peristomal skin complication incidence was 40.5% in the treatment group and 55.4% in the control group; the reported 14.9% difference was not statistically significant (P = .069).

03More peristomal skin complications resolved within 4 weeks in the treatment group than in the control group (53% vs 29%; P = .042).

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study stopped at 153 subjects after an interim analysis, so the cost result is based on early stopping. The peristomal skin complication incidence difference was not statistically significant, so the barrier did not clearly show it prevents complications. Costs were modeled to a 12-week period from follow-up times of 1 to 97 days, so real long-term costs are not shown. Only one manufacturer's barriers were compared, although fit options and accessories from other manufacturers were allowed. The sample was adults with new ostomies and healthy peristomal skin, so it does not show effects in patients who already had skin complications or in long-term ostomy care.

Declared interests

The supplied text names Hollister Incorporated as the barrier manufacturer but does not state funding or author conflicts.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the lower skin complication rate as proof the barrier prevents complications. The cost result was significant, but the complication rate difference was not statistically significant (P = .069).

Read it on PubMed →


The study

Participants
153 eligible subjects analysed (79 treatment, 74 control)
Certainty of evidence
Moderate

More in medical-surgical

Browse

Cite

Janice C Colwell, Joyce Pittman, Rose Raizman, et al. A Randomized Controlled Trial Determining Variances in Ostomy Skin Conditions and the Economic Impact (ADVOCATE Trial). Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society. 2018.

Read the original