A Quasi-Experimental Study Investigating the Impact of a Lifestyle Redesign Program on the Well-Being of Korean University Students.

The sample size was very small (33 participants), which limits statistical power. The study used a convenience sample of occupational therapy students at a single university, so results may not apply to other student populations or disciplines. The control group received active encouragement (calls/emails), which may have contributed to their improvements, making it hard to isolate the effect of the full LR program. The authors were involved in both designing and delivering the intervention, introducing potential bias. The 10-week duration may have been too short to detect significant differences in some quality of life domains.

The authors declared that they were involved in both designing and delivering the Lifestyle Redesign intervention, which they acknowledge as a source of potential bias. No external funding sources or commercial conflicts of interest were explicitly detailed in the provided text beyond this methodological limitation.

Do not conclude that Lifestyle Redesign is superior to standard care for all outcomes. The control group improved significantly in occupational performance, and between-group comparisons showed no significant difference for performance, satisfaction, or quality of life. Only stress reduction was significantly better in the LR group.