A Person-Centered Prehabilitation Program Based on Cognitive-Behavioral Physical Therapy for Patients Scheduled for Lumbar Fusion Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Hanna Lotzke, Helena Brisby, Annelie Gutke and 4 others
PMID 30951604WHAT IT FOUND
Before lumbar fusion surgery, the cognitive-behavioral physical therapy prehabilitation did not reduce disability more than conventional care.
Both groups improved, and a health-related quality-of-life secondary result favored the program but did not reach the minimal important change.
Key findings
01The primary disability outcome showed no statistically significant difference between the active intervention and conventional care groups in the intention-to-treat analysis.
02A secondary health-related quality-of-life outcome showed a statistically significant interaction effect, with the largest between-group difference 1 week before surgery favoring active intervention, but the difference did not reach the minimal important change.
03At 8 weeks postoperatively, disability had already decreased by at least 8 points in both groups.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Participants were younger and less disabled than the broader Swedish spine registry population, so the result may not apply to more disabled patients. Conventional care was delivered by local physical therapists and was not controlled, so it may have varied. Most patients had surgery at the same clinic where active treatment was delivered, which could have increased contamination between groups. The active intervention was controlled by a manual, but delivery was not observed during the trial, so treatment fidelity is uncertain. The significant secondary quality-of-life difference did not reach the minimal important change. Patients missing follow-up had higher baseline fear of movement, depression, or worse balance, so missing data may have influenced some results.
Declared interests
The funders were AFA Research Funding, Eurospine Research Grants, Swedish Research Council, Health and Medical Care Executive Board of the Västra Götaland Region, and Doctor Felix Neubergh Grants. The paper states that the funders played no role in the design, conduct, or reporting of the study.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that this prehabilitation program is superior to conventional care. The primary disability outcome was null, and the significant health-related quality-of-life finding was secondary and did not reach the minimal important change.