A Novel Method to Determine the Maximum Output of Individual Patients for an Active Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Implant Using Clinical Routine Data.
Mohammad Ghoncheh, Susan Busch, Thomas Lenarz and 1 others
PMID 37580866WHAT IT FOUND
A new method using routine hearing data determines the maximum output of Bonebridge implants.
It found the implant produces 4 to 8 dB higher output on the implanted side than the opposite side. This helps clinicians set accurate indication ranges without complex equipment.
Key findings
01The proposed method determines the maximum output hearing level using only routine audiometric bone conduction and direct bone conduction thresholds.
02The average maximum output hearing level was 4 to 8 dB higher on the implanted side compared to the contralateral side.
03The study suggests that current indication limits for single-sided deafness may be too conservative based on the observed output differences.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The study did not use masked direct bone conduction thresholds, which are the gold standard for determining which ear perceives the sound. Researchers had to infer the side of perception based on unmasked thresholds and transcranial attenuation estimates, introducing potential error. The transcranial attenuation values used for grouping were median values from previous literature (Stenfelt 2012), not individual measurements from these patients, which may not accurately reflect the specific implant sites used in this study. The method predicts the theoretically possible maximum output, not the actual output achieved in a clinical fitting, which is limited by feedback and gain settings. This is a retrospective analysis of existing data, not a prospective trial testing patient outcomes or speech recognition performance with the new method.
Declared interests
The work was funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG). Three authors (M. G., S. B., and H. M.) received travel support to conferences from MED-EL, the manufacturer of the Bonebridge device. The authors declare no other conflicts of interest.
The easy way to misread this
Do not assume this method changes clinical practice immediately. It calculates a theoretical maximum output based on device specifications and thresholds, not the actual audible output a patient experiences in a real-world fitting. Furthermore, the study suggests current indication limits might be too conservative, but it did not test whether expanding these limits actually improves patient outcomes.