A Multi-component Intervention (NEXpro) Reduces Neck Pain-Related Work Productivity Loss: A Randomized Controlled Trial Among Swiss Office Workers.
Andrea Martina Aegerter, Manja Deforth, Thomas Volken and 10 others
PMID 36167936WHAT IT FOUND
A 12-week workplace programme combining ergonomics, education and neck exercises cut neck-pain-related productivity loss by 2.8 percentage points in Swiss office workers.
The effect was small and below the threshold for individual clinical importance, but saved CHF 27.40 per person weekly.
Key findings
01The multi-component intervention reduced neck pain-related work productivity loss by an average marginal effect of 2.8 percentage points compared to the control period.
02The observed effect size was classified as small because it fell below the 7-20% absolute change typically considered a minimal clinically important difference for this outcome.
03Adherence to the neck exercise component was low, with only 27.1% of participants meeting the recommended frequency, while adherence to the ergonomics component was very high.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The study population was highly educated, well-paid, and mostly female, which may not represent all office workers or other countries. The intervention was multi-component (ergonomics, workshops, exercises), so it is impossible to determine which part caused the reduction in productivity loss. The primary outcome was self-reported via questionnaires, which can be influenced by recall bias or social desirability. The study took place during the COVID-19 pandemic, which changed working environments (e.g., working from home) and may have affected adherence and results. The effect size was small and below the threshold for minimal clinically important difference, limiting its relevance for individual patient care. Medication use and other concurrent treatments were not recorded, which could have influenced neck pain levels.
Declared interests
The study was funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation and the Zurich University of Applied Sciences. No commercial conflicts of interest were declared.
The easy way to misread this
Do not interpret the 2.8 percentage point reduction as a clinically significant improvement for individual patients. The authors classify the effect as small because it falls below the minimal clinically important difference threshold of 7-20%. Additionally, because the intervention combined ergonomics, education, and exercise, you cannot attribute the result to any single component.