A cross-cultural study of autistic traits across India, Japan and the UK.
Sophie Carruthers, Emma Kinnaird, Alokananda Rudra and 8 others
PMID 30410715WHAT IT FOUND
Five social communication items identified children with autism from typically developing controls across India, Japan and the UK.
Four items about spontaneity, talking over others, jokes and social occasions varied by country, so translated screening questions may need checking.
Key findings
01Five parent-reported social communication items were excellent at separating children with autism from controls in all three countries.
02The study identified 16 items that best predicted autism in India, 15 in Japan and 28 in the UK.
03Four items showed possible cultural differences, including spontaneity, talking so others cannot get a word in, understanding jokes and enjoying social occasions.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The autism groups were selected from support organisations, special schools and a volunteer database, not from population surveys, so they may not represent all children with autism. The India and Japan samples were much smaller than the UK sample, and the Indian sample was urban only, so results may not apply to rural or community presentations. No data were available on ethnicity, specific IQ or socio-economic status, which could influence parent responses. Diagnostic procedures and recruitment methods varied across countries and studies, and controls were not compared with children with other neurodevelopmental disorders. Parent reports were collected after diagnosis, so parents' awareness of autism may have increased endorsement of autistic traits. Some apparent cultural differences may reflect translation or wording problems rather than true differences in behaviour. The five universal items were not tested as a standalone screening tool, and the authors do not recommend replacing current screening tools with these items.
The easy way to misread this
Do not treat the five universal items or the country-specific short versions as ready-to-use diagnostic tools. The authors state that evaluating these items as a brief screener was beyond the scope of this paper and that they do not recommend using these items in place of current screening tools.