RNSystematic ReviewJournal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing2025

What Is a Good Death in South Asia? A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.

Lihini Wijeyaratne, Odette Spruijt, Saroj Jayasinghe and 3 others

PMID 40099669

WHAT IT FOUND

A good death in South Asia often meant pain control, family involvement, spiritual rituals, and choices about prognosis and place of death.

Nurses should ask each patient and family what these mean to them.

Key findings

01The synthesis identified four themes: mutual care and connection, freedom to choose, opportunities in the last days, and after death matters.

02Pain and symptom control were widely considered essential, but uncontrolled pain and financial distress could limit a patient's ability to choose and participate in care.

03Patients differed in wanting information and decision-making: some wanted access to illness, treatment, prognosis, and quality-of-life discussions, while others preferred family or clinicians to decide.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Initial screening and extraction were done by one reviewer, so important studies could have been missed. Most evidence came from India, and there were no included studies from Nepal, Afghanistan, or the Maldives, so the picture is incomplete for South Asia. The included studies were qualitative, survey, and mixed-method work about preferences, not tests of whether an intervention improves outcomes. Many qualitative studies did not report reflexivity, data saturation, or how data were selected. Many quantitative studies used adapted questionnaires rather than validated tools, and some used purposive or convenience sampling.

Declared interests

The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not treat the themes as evidence that a particular end-of-life intervention improves outcomes. This review describes what patients, families, and clinicians valued, not what happened after a treatment.

Read it on PubMed →