What do we know about the experience of seclusion in a forensic setting? An integrative literature review.
Alison Hansen, Michael Hazelton, Robyn Rosina and 1 others
PMID 35384224WHAT IT FOUND
Forensic mental health patients largely described seclusion as frightening, punishing and harmful, though some valued time to calm or feel safe.
Staff interactions, clothing removal and boring rooms strongly shaped whether it felt caring or abusive.
Key findings
01Seclusion was commonly described as a negative, harmful, and punitive experience.
02Some participants described positive aspects, including time to reflect and seeing seclusion as necessary for safety.
03The physical environment and staff behaviour strongly shaped whether seclusion felt caring or abusive.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTsWhat it means for RNs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The review included only a small number of studies, so the themes cannot be assumed to apply to every forensic mental health setting. Security levels varied, and findings from rehabilitation or unspecified forensic settings may not generalise to high secure wards. Some studies combined seclusion with physical restraint or forced medication, making it difficult to separate experiences specific to seclusion. The review could not determine whether women and men experience seclusion differently because most studies did not report responses by sex. Female and non-binary experiences were underrepresented.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read the positive experiences as evidence that seclusion is beneficial or safe. The review found seclusion was largely negative, harmful, and punitive, and some positive reports reflected patients' need for calm, privacy, or safety rather than proof that seclusion works.