OTRCTJournal of autism and developmental disorders2024

Virtual Interview Training Among BIPOC Autistic Transition-Age Youth: A Secondary Analysis of an Initial Effectiveness RCT.

Ed-Dee G Williams, Matthew J Smith

PMID 37269499

WHAT IT FOUND

BIPOC autistic youth using a virtual interview simulator alongside standard transition services showed improved interview skills and lower anxiety.

They were more likely to get competitive jobs (27.3%) than those in standard services alone (0%). The sample was very small.

Key findings

01Youth using the virtual interview tool had significantly higher rates of competitive employment (27.3%) compared to the control group (0%).

02The intervention group showed significant improvements in job interview skills and self-reported likeliness to be hired, along with reduced interview anxiety.

03Participants rated the virtual interview training as highly acceptable and usable.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study was underpowered with only 32 participants, making the results preliminary. The sample was limited to BIPOC youth in Michigan and Ohio, so findings may not generalize to all BIPOC communities. Teachers were aware of group assignments, which could have introduced bias in how they supported students. The study did not collect detailed data on the types of jobs, wages, or hours worked. Adverse events were not systematically monitored at each visit.

Declared interests

The University of Michigan receives royalties from SIMmersion LLC, the developer of the VIT-TAY tool, and these royalties are shared with Dr. Matthew Smith and the University of Michigan School of Social Work.

The easy way to misread this

Do not assume this large difference in employment rates (27.3% vs 0%) will hold in a larger, fully powered trial. The sample size was very small (32 participants), and the study was explicitly underpowered, so these results are preliminary and require replication.

Read it on PubMed →