RNSystematic ReviewInternational journal of mental health nursing2022

Valued attributes of professional support for people who repeatedly self-harm: A systematic review and meta-synthesis of first-hand accounts.

Cara Sass, Cathy Brennan, Kate Farley and 6 others

PMID 35034422

WHAT IT FOUND

Patients who reduced or stopped self-harm valued professionals who were trustworthy, empathic, non-judgemental, and willing to discuss self-harm.

They did not report specific therapy techniques. Nurses can focus on how they listen, avoid labels, and advocate during distress.

Key findings

01People who had reduced or stopped self-harm valued professionals who were trustworthy, empathic, non-judgemental, and comfortable understanding and discussing self-harm.

02The accounts did not identify the specific therapies received; they described the value of talking to professionals and the personal qualities of individual clinicians.

03A direct account described a nurse who recognised escalating distress, took control of the conversation, and spoke with a doctor so the person could obtain leave.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The review synthesizes accounts from people who had already reduced or stopped self-harm, so it cannot show what caused that change. Quotations containing therapy or counselling references did not identify the specific treatment approaches, so the review cannot compare therapies or isolate techniques. Only 23 articles contained direct accounts related to professional support, and the 67 quotations could not be linked to a known number of individuals. The review was limited to English-language versions, which may exclude culturally varied experiences. The team relied on quotations selected by original authors, and some articles lacked context about the professional interactions. Most articles had larger samples of women than men, and one article did not describe the recruitment setting.

Declared interests

The article states that the project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Programme Grants for Applied Research; its funding and conflicts statement names only this funder.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read these themes as evidence that a particular nurse behaviour or therapy makes self-harm stop. The review reports what people who had already reduced or stopped self-harm valued, and it could not identify the specific therapies they received.

Read it on PubMed →