Validity of the Capacity to Work Index: Development of an Instrument to Measure Work Capacity in Relation to Depression and Anxiety in the General Working Population.
Gunnel Hensing, Cornelia van Diepen, Maria Boström and 1 others
PMID 37938436WHAT IT FOUND
A 17-item Capacity to Work Index about work capacity problems in depression and anxiety was developed from qualitative studies and tested in 51 hospital staff.
It showed consistent responses and related to wellbeing, but it is not ready to guide return-to-work decisions.
Key findings
01The final C2WI had 17 items and was developed from three qualitative studies that explored work and common mental disorders.
02The initial field test analysed 51 unique participants, and the C2WI had Cronbach's alpha 0.84.
03The C2WI correlated positively with the WHO-5 Well-Being Scale (r = 0.68) and negatively with the WAI measure (r = -0.33).
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The field test analysed only 51 unique participants, and the authors state this was smaller than anticipated and reduced statistical strength. The sample was mainly female nurses in Swedish hospital departments, so it may not represent other occupations, countries, or welfare systems. Test-retest reliability could not be properly assessed because only 19 of 70 employees completed both questionnaires. The authors did not remove items that did not fit the main pattern in this initial field test because the sample was small and the professional group was homogeneous. The index has not been tested for external validity, cut-off levels, or prediction of sickness absence. People with lived experience of common mental disorders were not included in the early item development phase.
Declared interests
Funding was from Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd and the University of Gothenburg. No competing-interest statement is provided in the supplied text.
The easy way to misread this
Do not treat the C2WI as a validated clinical tool for return-to-work decisions. The initial field test analysed 51 Swedish health care professionals, mainly nurses, and the authors state that larger and more diverse samples are needed. The correlations with wellbeing and workability do not show that the index predicts sickness absence.