PTOtherHong Kong physiotherapy journal : official publication of the Hong Kong Physiotherapy Association Limited = Wu li chih liao2016

Validity and reliability of a thoracic kyphotic assessment tool measuring distance of the seventh cervical vertebra from the wall.

Pipatana Amatachaya, Sawitree Wongsa, Thanat Sooknuan and 4 others

PMID 30931031

WHAT IT FOUND

A C7-to-wall distance tool was dependable and agreed with Flexicurve kyphosis angle in older people with thoracic kyphosis.

Physical therapists, village health volunteers, and caregivers could use it to assess severity and walking endurance.

Key findings

01In 21 participants, the C7-to-wall distance had excellent reliability when used by a physical therapist, a village health volunteer, and a caregiver, with agreement scores (ICC) greater than 0.90 and p < 0.001.

02In 158 older adults, the C7-to-wall distance correlated with Flexicurve kyphosis angle at r = 0.902 and p < 0.001.

03In groups of 48 participants per severity category, more severe kyphosis by C7-to-wall distance was associated with shorter 6-minute walk distance, p < 0.001.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study included older adults with structural thoracic kyphosis and a body mass index between 18.5 kg/m2 and 29.9 kg/m2, and it excluded people who used walking devices or had pain, inflammation, scoliosis, leg length discrepancy, or upper back masses, so it may not apply to patients with those features. The tested measurement used the KypDist tool, not ordinary rulers, so the results do not confirm that a simple C7-to-wall measurement with a ruler has the same accuracy. The Flexicurve was used as the reference standard, and the authors note its shape can change when removed from the spine and its landmarks can be hard to identify, especially in overweight or obese people. The study was cross-sectional, so it cannot show that kyphosis caused reduced walking endurance or that the tool tracks change over time. The comparison between moderate and severe kyphosis had low explanatory power, and lifestyle or comorbidities were not considered.

Declared interests

The authors declared that they have no conflicts of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that the KypDist tool directly measures thoracic kyphosis or that it has been shown to monitor change over time. It measures C7-to-wall distance, was validated against Flexicurve, and the study was cross-sectional.

Read it on PubMed →


The study

Participants
21 participants for reliability assessments; 158 for concurrent validity; 48 per kyphosis severity group for discriminative validity
Certainty of evidence
Low

More in geriatrics

Browse

Cite

Pipatana Amatachaya, Sawitree Wongsa, Thanat Sooknuan, et al. Validity and reliability of a thoracic kyphotic assessment tool measuring distance of the seventh cervical vertebra from the wall. Hong Kong physiotherapy journal : official publication of the Hong Kong Physiotherapy Association Limited = Wu li chih liao. 2016.

Read the original