RNOtherJournal of pediatric nursing2020

Using the Engaging Parents in Education for Discharge (ePED) iPad Application to Improve Parent Discharge Experience.

Stacee M Lerret, Norah L Johnson, Michele Polfuss and 11 others

PMID 32163845

WHAT IT FOUND

Care coordination ratings did not differ when a nurse used the ePED app during discharge.

Parents rated discharge teaching slightly better: 9.59 versus 9.33 on a 10-point scale.

Key findings

01Parents rated discharge teaching higher when a nurse used the ePED app: 9.59 versus 9.33 on a 0 to 10 scale, with a small effect.

02Care coordination ratings did not differ between ePED and usual care parents: 3.77 versus 3.74 on a 1 to 4 scale.

03In the ePED group, each one-point increase in care coordination score was associated with 55% lower chance of at least one readmission (OR = 0.45).

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study used a quasi-experimental design rather than randomization, and the ePED unit was a surgical unit while the comparison unit was a medical unit. The sample came from one hospital and two units, so results may not apply to other settings. Parent ratings were very high in both groups. This ceiling may limit the size of any measurable improvement. The care coordination measure was completed before discharge, not after the family had experienced the transition home. Nurse experience and other nurse characteristics were not collected, so differences in nurse skill may have influenced ratings. Comparison nurses were trained to collect parent experience data, which may have increased their awareness of discharge teaching. The assigned nurse delivered the teaching, so parent ratings may reflect that nurse rather than the app alone. The ePED group also involved nurse training, so the app's effect cannot be separated from the training. The study design did not allow evaluation of the app's effect on readmissions because the units had different patient populations and readmission rates. Children with chronic conditions had a broad range of diagnoses and reasons for admission.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the 55% lower chance of readmission as proof that ePED prevents readmissions. It came from a secondary analysis in the ePED unit only, the units differed in patient type, and care coordination did not improve.

Read it on PubMed →