Usefulness of the cardiopulmonary exercise test up to the anaerobic threshold for pati-ents aged ≥ 80 years with cardiovascular disease on cardiac rehabilitation.
Yuiko Yano, Yasunori Suematsu, Takuro Matsuda and 5 others
PMID 38898677WHAT IT FOUND
Patients aged 80 and over with cardiovascular disease who could do an exercise test up to anaerobic threshold had mostly similar test results to patients aged 70 to 79, except lower heart rate and worse breathing efficiency at rest.
Key findings
01Gas exchange results during the exercise test did not differ significantly between patients aged 70 to 79 and patients aged 80 and over.
02Heart rate at rest and during warmup was lower in patients aged 80 and over than in patients aged 70 to 79.
03Breathing efficiency at rest was worse in patients aged 80 and over than in patients aged 70 to 79.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
This was a retrospective, single-centre record review, not a randomised trial, so it cannot show that CPET improves cardiac rehabilitation outcomes. The study included only patients who performed CPET, including 59 patients aged 80 and over, so it does not apply to older patients who could not perform the test or had low physical strength. Researchers did not analyse exercise responses beyond anaerobic threshold or peak interval measures because many older patients had a lower respiratory exchange ratio. Some cardiac and blood test data were missing because of the retrospective design. The under-70 group differed from older groups in sex, body mass index, smoking, underlying disease, medication, and treatment. Sex differences were not analysed because the sample size was small.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that cardiopulmonary exercise testing is useful for every patient aged 80 and over with cardiovascular disease. Only 59 patients aged 80 and over performed the test, and the study did not analyse responses beyond anaerobic threshold or measure rehabilitation outcomes.