A survey of 109 users of the Crosslinguistic Nonword Repetition Test found 92% considered it useful, mostly for screening multilingual children for DLD. It still lacks norms and practical guidance, so treat it as one part of a battery, not a standalone diagnosis.
72% (78/109) of those who had requested the CL-NWR had actually used it, with uptake spread across 32 of the 36 countries where it was requested.
92% (69/75) of users said the CL-NWR made a useful contribution to their assessment; the most common reasons were contribution to a research study (68%, 47/69), indicating strengths or limitations in phonological processing and memory (58%, 40/69), and indicating risk of DLD (54%, 37/69).
The most common request for future support was access to case studies or examples (62 respondents), followed by scoring examples or templates (57 respondents) and online training or video demonstrations (40 respondents).
Single-blind randomized controlled trial. Sixty-four participants were randomized across two intervention arms and assessed at twelve weeks for the primary outcome…
Create a free account to read the methodology, results and clinical relevance — three full summaries a month, no card.
Summarised by AI from the abstract, not the full paper. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →