RNOtherJournal of emergency nursing2021

United States ED Visits by Adult Women for Nonfatal Intimate Partner Strangulation, 2006 to 2014: Prevalence and Associated Characteristics.

Michelle Patch, Youssef M K Farag, Jocelyn C Anderson and 3 others

PMID 33744016

WHAT IT FOUND

Only 1.2% of U.S. emergency visits coded for intimate partner violence by women also had strangulation coding.

Strangulation-coded visits were more common among younger women and metropolitan hospitals.

Key findings

01The weighted prevalence of co-occurring strangulation codes among intimate partner violence visits by women was 1.2% (99% CI: 1.00%, 1.47%).

02Visits by younger women, aged 18 to 24, and metropolitan hospital visits had higher odds of co-occurring strangulation codes than visits by older women or non-metropolitan hospitals.

03The strangulation-coded visit distribution rose from 7.08% in 2006 to 20.63% in 2014.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The data are emergency department discharge records, not unique patients, so one woman with several visits could affect the counts. The records are administrative and de-identified, so patient narratives, clinical notes, and many social factors were not available. Strangulation had to be documented and coded to be counted, so missed documentation, variable coding, or patient reluctance to disclose could underestimate the true ED visit frequency. The study used a conservative intimate partner violence code, which may have excluded visits that were related to intimate partner violence but not coded that way. Women who did not seek emergency care are absent from the database, so the findings cannot describe all women who experience strangulation. The study cannot tell whether the rise in coded strangulation visits reflects more strangulation, better recognition, or better coding.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the 1.2% prevalence as the true rate of U.S. emergency visits for nonfatal intimate partner strangulation. The study is based on administrative codes, and the authors say undercoding, missed documentation, and women not seeking care may make this an underestimate.

Read it on PubMed →