PTOTOtherGait & posture2023

Uneven surface and cognitive dual-task independently affect gait quality in older adults.

Anisha Suri, Jessie VanSwearingen, Caterina Rosano and 4 others

PMID 37647710

WHAT IT FOUND

Uneven ground and reciting alternate letters each made older adults' walking slower, less rhythmic and less smooth.

Combining the two did not produce extra gait change beyond the effects of each alone.

Key findings

01Uneven surface and the alternate-letter cognitive task each independently reduced walking pace, rhythmicity and smoothness, and increased variability and regularity.

02Combining uneven surface and the cognitive task did not produce a larger gait effect than expected from the individual effects.

03Gait pace was not associated with cognitive measures after adjustment, while some dual-task gait variability, rhythmicity and adaptability scores were associated with global cognition.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

This was an observational cross-sectional analysis, not an intervention study, so it cannot show that changing a patient's walking environment or cognitive load causes clinical decline. The sample was highly educated and high-functioning: 104 older adults, mean age 75, 78 (75%) had more than high school education, and executive test scores were at or above the 80th percentile, so results may not apply to frailer or more cognitively impaired patients. Participants had to walk without assistance and were excluded for stroke, dementia or mild cognitive impairment symptoms, major motor or neurological disease; 13 participants were excluded because of accelerometry technical errors. The walking tasks were limited to 15 m straightaways with wood prisms under carpet and a simple alternate-letter task; the authors state these may not represent everyday obstacles, slopes or curved paths. Cognitive assessment was limited to MMSE and Trail Making Tests A and B, so other domains such as recall, working memory or verbal fluency were not examined. Some accelerometry data were sampled at 30 Hz and upsampled, and the study did not record perceived task difficulty or ask participants to prioritize walking or alphabeting.

Declared interests

The authors declared no conflict of interest. The article metadata indicates NIH extramural research support.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that uneven ground plus a cognitive task is worse for gait than either challenge alone. The study found no interaction effect between surface and cognition.

Read it on PubMed →