Turn an Ear to Hear: How Hearing-Impaired Listeners Can Exploit Head Orientation to Enhance Their Speech Intelligibility in Noisy Social Settings.
Jacques A Grange, John F Culling, Barry Bardsley and 3 others
PMID 30334495WHAT IT FOUND
Cochlear implant users made fewer spontaneous head turns than young normal-hearing listeners, and no more than age-matched normal-hearing listeners.
Telling them to explore head turns improved speech understanding, but clinic and web advice usually says face the talker head-on.
Key findings
01Young normal-hearing listeners made around 3 times more head movements than cochlear implant users and age-matched normal-hearing listeners, between whom there was no significant difference.
02After instruction to explore head orientation, subjective spatial release from masking improved by 1.6 dB for young normal-hearing listeners, 0.8 dB for age-matched normal-hearing listeners, and 1.2 dB for cochlear implant users.
03Of 31 professionals who reported giving advice, 27 said the advice was to frequently or always face the speaker and never turn the head away, and none of the reviewed patient webpages suggested a 20° to 30° head turn away from the talker.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Experiment 1 had a small sample, and one cochlear implant user was excluded. The subjective threshold was based on the last words the listener recalled, not on a standard adaptive threshold. Head orientation was measured from video with an accuracy of ±5°. Experiment 2 did not test real bilateral cochlear implant users; it used a vocoder simulation in normal-hearing listeners. The hearing-impaired group had typical age-related high-frequency loss, and the paper gives a different count for hearing-impaired participants in the figure note (15) than in the participant section (14). The restaurant was a simulation, not a real social setting. The surveys were self-report, created before the head-orientation findings were published, and the professional sample was 37, with only 31 reporting advice. The web review was not systematic, used Google, was limited to the first 10 pages per search, and was done by one reviewer. The paper did not test a clinical training programme or real-world communication outcomes.
Declared interests
Funded by Oticon Fonden and Action on Hearing Loss. The supplied text gives no additional conflict-of-interest declaration.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that telling cochlear implant users to turn their heads away from the talker has proven clinical benefit. The improvement was measured in laboratory speech-in-noise clips and a virtual restaurant, and the cochlear implant benefit in Experiment 2 came from simulation rather than real bilateral implant users.