PTRCTGait & posture2018

Trunk motion visual feedback during walking improves dynamic balance in older adults: Assessor blinded randomized controlled trial.

Eric Anson, Lei Ma, Tippawan Meetam and 4 others

PMID 29614467

WHAT IT FOUND

Older adults with self-reported balance problems improved dynamic balance after treadmill walking with on-screen trunk motion feedback.

Walking alone did not improve balance, and average gains were smaller than the change usually needed to be sure an individual improved.

Key findings

01The primary balance tests, BESTest and mini-BESTest, improved after trunk motion visual feedback walking, but not after walking without feedback.

02Treadmill walking without visual feedback did not improve balance or mobility scores.

03Exploratory sensory subgroup analyses suggested that participants with vestibular or multisensory impairment improved more on some BESTest subtests than participants with no sensory impairment.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Only 40 older adults were analysed, and they were recruited using self-reported balance problems, so the results may not apply to more impaired clinical populations. Fourteen of the 40 participants were classified as fallers, and many scored above the cut-off thresholds for identifying increased fall risk, so the sample was not uniformly high-risk. Participants had to pass a brief cognitive screen and walk safely on a treadmill for at least 2 minutes, which excludes some older adults who might need balance training. Only the assessors were blinded; participants were not explicitly told their group but were not blinded, so performance or reporting could be affected. The study had no follow-up after week 8, so it is unknown how long any benefit lasted. The average improvement on the primary tests was below the minimum detectable change reported for those tests, and only three individuals exceeded it on the BESTest and another three exceeded it on the mini-BESTest. The sensory subgroup findings were exploratory and involved small numbers, with 4 or 5 participants in each sensory category, so they cannot determine who will benefit. The Berg Balance Scale, Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale, and 6-minute walk test may not have been sensitive enough to capture change: the Berg Balance Scale had a possible ceiling effect, confidence scores were above the fall-risk threshold, and the walking speed task was designed not to change walking ability. It is unknown whether sensory function or sensitivity changed after training, which could have contributed to the results. Two authors are listed as inventors of the sensory treadmill used in the study.

Declared interests

J Jeka and E Anson are listed as inventors of the sensory treadmill described in the experiment; all other authors declared no conflict of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that this feedback prevents falls or produces clinically meaningful improvement for most participants. The trial measured balance test scores, not fall outcomes, and the average improvement was below the change usually needed to be sure an individual improved.

Read it on PubMed →