OtherAutism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research2020

Trial-to-Trial Variability in Electrodermal Activity to Odor in Autism.

Sarah M Haigh, Yaara Endevelt-Shapira, Marlene Behrmann

PMID 32860323

WHAT IT FOUND

Adults with autism did not show greater trial-to-trial variability in skin conductance to odor and faces.

They showed less variability to fear odor, but the overall group difference was not significant.

Key findings

01The autism group did not show greater overall trial-to-trial variability in skin conductance; the overall group difference was not significant.

02In the fear odor condition, while faces were also presented, the autism group showed significantly less trial-to-trial variability than controls, while the neutral odor condition showed no significant difference.

03Average peak skin conductance to faces differed by group and odor: the autism group had similar responses to fear and neutral odors, while controls had a larger response to fear.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they found

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Only 17 adults with autism and 19 neurotypical controls were analysed after exclusions, so the sample is small. All participants were male, so the findings may not apply to females with autism. The overall group difference in trial-to-trial variability was not significant, and the group by odor interaction was not significant, even though the separate fear odor comparison reached significance. The Bayes Factor for the variability interaction suggested evidence against a difference, so the fear odor finding should be interpreted cautiously. Skin conductance measures relative change, so it is unclear whether the autism group already had higher baseline activity, which could make the stimulus-evoked response look smaller. The study was not designed to test whether groups detected the fear odor differently, and the odors were presented without telling participants. The small number of face presentations prevented testing interactions between odor and facial emotion.

Declared interests

The authors declared no conflict of interest. The publication types list U.S. and non-U.S. government research support.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read this as evidence that adults with autism have greater skin conductance variability to odor and faces overall. The overall group difference was not significant, and the significant result was less variability only in the fear odor condition.

Read it on PubMed →


The study

Participants
17 male adults with autism and 19 male neurotypical controls analysed, from 20 male adults with autism and 20 male controls recruited
Certainty of evidence
Low

Browse

    Cite

    Sarah M Haigh, Yaara Endevelt-Shapira, Marlene Behrmann Trial-to-Trial Variability in Electrodermal Activity to Odor in Autism. Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research. 2020.

    Read the original